Tweet Tweet the Whistleblower is...

So Donald Trump, now the President of the United States, was, earlier this morning, under attack by virtually the entire Mainstream Media for tweeting out (once again) the identity of the so-called "whistleblower" whose name was spattered all over today's early morning news headlines but as of 8:30 AM has been scrubbed out of existence, I kid you not.
The so-called "whistleblower" is none other than the person - or should I say the spy within Trump's White House - who somehow found out that President Trump had asked the newly-elected leader of the Ukraine, a man elected by the people of Ukraine to combat rampant corruption within their country, to look into the involvement of the previous U.S. administration in Ukrainian corruption, namely former Vice President Joe Biden's role. Biden is on video bragging about threatening to withhold aid to the Ukraine unless they fired a corruption prosecutor who was quite likely looking into the Biden connection to Ukrainian corruption, a role which the Mainstream Media has been working overtime to make disappear in true Orwellian style.
So anyway just an hour or two back this so-called "whistleblower's" name was in the headlines and now it's gone despite the fact that Trump had his Twitter account suspended for awhile while Twitter tried to resolve so-called technical difficulties.
Despite the fact that this so-called "whistleblower's" name has been in the news for months now and will be recorded in infamy as the guy who blew the whistle on President Trump leading to his impeachment, his name does not appear in Wikipedia, not as of this moment anyway.
Go figure, eh?
The United States intelligence apparatus is waging a regime change war against the President of the United States and it's plain as day what's going on and how is it being treated by the mainstream media and Twitter and Wikipedia, resources that the American people rely on for facts, truth, reality? Hush hush!
For another perspective...

F-16 Video from 2016 at Titusville, Florida

Here's something I've never seen before, a flying adventure in an F-16 fighter doing a low level airshow like flight with the camera looking over the pilot's shoulder forward out through the canopy.  Just before the eleven minute mark he overtakes a P-51 Mustang. And he flies with it for awhile after the 12:30 mark.
Nice flying guy!
F-16 - Viper Demo - Shoulder View - 2016
It amazed me the last time I was at an airshow how small these airplanes are when you walk up to one on the ground, yet how fast and effective they are in the air.

A Must See That Seems Worth Watching

I'll save this YouTube video for future reference:
The Vanishing American Adult

Fake Unity

You know, I was taken in by Tulsi Gabbard the same way I was taken in by Barack Obama before I realized how fake he was. Heck, Hawaii had to fake his birth certificates. How fake can it get!
She may eventually unite the Left around her Socialism, but she sure is losing the Right in spades by putting down President Trump. It would be one thing if she were trying to convince America that she was better qualified or had a better plan for America but instead she just keeps on trashing our President.

Tulsi? #FakeUnity

Oh wait, you disagree with me that Obama's birth certificates had to be faked? Well I suppose you may be right - or wrong. Clearly his long form birth certificate was an official document according to the Hawaii official responsible for the "copies". But I still haven't come to terms with what was meant by "I am making an exception to current department policy which is to issue a computer-generated certified copy." Was current department policy at the time (April 25, 2011)

1. to issue a photocopy as everybody naturally would assume since that's how it's normally done anywhere else in the world, or...
2. to issue a computer-generated copy which would explain why forensics specialists assumed the document looked like a forgery

Ya got me but I would assume what this letter states is that issuing a computer-generated copy - a fake or a forgery - was an exception to current department policy but, hey, considering who was doing the requesting, we'll comply with the request and not only that but we'll make it real by certifying it.

An Orwellian concept for sure, fake is real.

Oh, "What letter?" you ask...

This one from Obama's White House archive.

Maybe it's the archive that's fake, eh?

Why would that letter (the third letter on that archive page) not mention the word "photocopy" at all? What, is a photocopy too easily faked? So instead they generated an original computer version which likely didn't even exist until they created it? I mean, did Hawaii use computer-generated birth certificates back when Obama was born when the only certifiable means of duplication and record keeping was by using paper and film?

Dahhhhhhh

Fake is fake no matter who does the requesting.

I'll bet Tulsi would throw her first ever fit if anyone tried to ask her to clarify this letter. I'm finding it harder by the day to trust anything that comes from her velvety Obama-like mouth. Aloha my friggin' ass.

Narcissistic Victimology at Yale

The title of this post came compliments of this YouTube video:
Heather Mac Donald On How The Delusion of Diversity Destroys Our Common Humanity

The "Cultural Revolution" Red China style is coming to a location near you, are you prepared?

I've been thinking lately how is it that the new modern liberal intolerance for thinking outside of their box is somehow related to their love for diversity when they are working so hard towards consensus thinking? It's mind boggling to me how absurd and mentally crippled that kind of thinking has become.
Oh and if you are unaware of what happened in Mao's Red China during the Cultural Revolution, how many good people were tortured and imprisoned and killed, stop ignoring the truth.
Wake up America! Wake up!

#FullofSchiff

So I notice in a comment on a YouTube video that someone used the phrase "full of Schiff" and I recall hearing about the "Schiff show" over the past few years in the U.S. House of Representatives, OK?
So it dawns on me that this would make a good hashtag - #FullofSchiff - so of course I Google it and discover it's already out there in use. No surprise there. It should be in use worldwide!
But...
Google's 7th in the list for search results is "Full of Schiff" with this partial definition:
"Slang - When a politician or media spokesperson talks continuously going on repeating themselves emphasizing what they alone think, usually without regard …"
Just as it was getting good, eh?
The link was pointing to the Urban Dictionary so of course I click on that and...
Sorry, we couldn't find: Full of Schiff
OK so let's go to the Urban Dictionary and do a search for it in there, shall we?
Awww... same result.
Well maybe "Jack Schiff" - let's try it...
Awwww... Darn it! Same thing...
How about "Schiff Show"? That one probably put Roger Stone behind bars...
Same thing! What, am I spelling Schiff wrong?
You try.
Oh god... Urban Dictionary definition of "Schiff": "To serve with honor and integrity, like Congressman Adam Schiff."
Hmmmm...
So Full of Schiff would mean virtually bubbling over with - frothing with - honor and integrity. Talk about virtue signaling! Man! Oh sorry, I mean Woman! No, can't be that... Hmmm... Person! Yeah that's the word. Person alive!

Tell me the Internet isn't being politically censored by the Dems.

Democrats Are Skunks

Democrats just plain stink to high heaven, like dead skunks in the middle of the road.

History in the Making

As I type this I am hearing Alex Jones in the background talking over various speakers in the House of Representatives as they march their way through the technicalities of declaring war against the Executive branch of the United States of America.
I never thought I would hear any politician publicly condense together more lies than George W. Bush but these modern-day Democrats take the cake hands down.
But they are making their intentions clear. They want President Trump prostrate to them or else removed from the White House and if things roll their way with the persistent efforts of the Deep State they want Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi in his place. This is civil war in the truest sense.
What is their basis for the impeachment of Donald Trump? Because he wants to expose their greatest possible weakness, Joe Biden. They all know if Joe is brought to justice, everything gets exposed to the public. The bull finally gets to rage inside the china shop. They can't risk it. The Deep State would crumble if the American public knew what they have been doing in the name of America.
The Republicans in the House are actually speaking truth to power. This is history in the making. The war is on.

Update December 19, 2019
According to this website, Maine's two delegates to the House, Golden and Pingree both voted in favor of the first article of impeachment for "abuse of power" while they disagreed on the second article for obstruction of Congress with Golden joining the Republicans voting against. Golden may have been the only person in Congress to vote yes on one article and no on the other.

To her credit, Tulsi Gabbard chose not to abuse her power and was the only person in Congress to vote "present".
Tulsi on Impeachment: A house divided cannot stand.
Tragically, as much as I find her good judgment appealing, this video alone is enough to ensure that Tulsi will never become President. The future will prove what she says here about Trump's guilt to be wrong. She may not appear to have blood on her hands but in reality she does. Rather than uniting America she has alienated both the liars and the truth seekers.

I have never in my life read a Stephen King novel and probably never will. Horror story fiction writers probably shouldn't be dictating American foreign policy.

Here's a short speech from yesterday's House revolution that pretty well sums up my views on the issue: Rep. Collins explodes, gets standing ovation in impeachment debate
What Representative Collins says here is true. The Democrats did not prove their case. If anything, they disproved their claims. Yet that didn't seem to matter to them. They voted to impeach the President of the United States on false accusations that had been proven false right there in the House for the whole world to see. It takes the heart of a traitor to support the Democrats now. Yesterday the United States House of Representatives voted on party lines for Deep State rule as opposed to constitutional authority. It's the whole Democratic Party that needs to be impeached. They have now proven themselves to be the party of treason.

Scumbaggery

Somebody beat me to the punch.
I was watching an extensive documentary on YouTube about George Westinghouse, the inventor whose name became synonymous with electricity and electrical appliances along with GE (spun off from Tomas Edison's pursuits). The documentary describes Edison's competitive shenanigans against Westinghouse but it also tells about the New York bankers, JP Morgan in particular, who weaseled the Westinghouse company out of its rightful owner's hands which may well have been the beginning of the end for George Westinghouse's health and life.
The term "scumbaggery" came to mind but when I Googled it I found it to be a word already, at least in slang.
How many people think of Thomas Edison, inventor of the record player, as a scumbag? This documentary attributes the invention of the electric chair to Edison who wanted to prove the dangers of Westinghouse's AC, alternating current, you know the stuff that comes out of your electric outlets and ran virtually every household electrical appliance and every factory for the past hundred years. Nice move there, Thomas. Scumbag.

Maybe I have this all wrong though. I only watched the video one time. You can watch it yourself if you wish to check my observations:
WESTINGHOUSE (Full Documentary) | The Powerhouse Struggle of Patents & Business with Nikola Tesla

The Russia Hoax Dump

Well maybe here we go again. I find myself overwhelmed by "sources" that are far too complex for my feeble truth-loving Conservative wannabe mind to process. Yesterday I was listening to the hearing of a US Senate committee chaired by Neocon and (now deceased) John McCain apologist Lindsey Graham, Republican senator from South Carolina. Since Trump's election in 2016 Graham has been waffling between being a Trump despiser and a Trump supporter so in my mind he is anything but trustworthy. He has an agenda and he uses his power to advance that agenda even if it does involve some serious arm-twisting. Of course as is the case now with virtually any government business his agenda isn't "overt"... anything but.

The Senate hearing yesterday that I overheard "live" online concerned the report issued on November 9, 2019 by the team from the OIG - Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice - led by Michael Horowitz who was the person being interviewed at this Senate hearing. I refer to this report as the IG report.

Deep State

Curiously one of the Democrat senators chose this hearing as her soapbox for announcing to the American people and to the world that there is no such thing as the "Deep State" and that this IG report proves it. The senator making this point also dwelled on the notion that there was no political bias involved with the FBI investigation, a conclusion not at all supported nor refuted by Horowitz, the witness - hard to believe I know but apparently true. Wouldn't it fall on the OIG team investigating this abuse of power to determine if political bias motivated the abusers? Apparently not.
The Senator is Dianne Feinstein, Democrat from California.

This Feinstein claim that this report and these hearings prove there is no "Deep State" is hilarious to me considering that what this report is all about is how the deep state bungled their effort to engulf Donald Trump in all sorts of accusations and to spy on and smear and destroy the careers of people related to the Trump campaign while at the same time trying every method possible to mask and cover up their efforts to bring Trump down - all while claiming "national security" as their justification. In my mind the term "National Security" is virtually synonymous with the term "Deep State". The term Deep State refers to that set of all career bureaucrats and power brokers who see themselves as the definers, overseers, and protectors of "National Security" who ensure that the voters and elected transients in government don't mess up the domestic and foreign policies of the United States. These bureaucrats don't take orders from the political class, they tell the political class what needs to be done and they ensure that their Deep State plans are carried out. Many of the individuals responsible for this particular breach of the Constitution just plain are the Deep State. Feinstein is scamming us.

Republicans Playing Along

It does appear to me that the Republicans are playing along with this effort to mask and hide the Deep State. Ask yourself why...

Names Involved

Kevin Clinesmith

the individual some identify as the FBI lawyer who falsified a FISA application to hide a known connection between Carter Page (the target of FISA warrants to surveil the Trump campaign in 2016) and the CIA, presumably to eliminate the possibility that the FISA warrant would be in jeopardy if the judge involved knew of the CIA connection.
His name does not appear in the IG report.
Questions:
Which FISA application did this alteration pertain to?
When did this falsification take place? Senator Lindsey Graham says it was June 2017. See the 36 minute mark in this YouTube video: Graham opens IG hearing with scathing take on FISA report: The system failed
What was Carter Page's CIA connection that this falsification masked?
Why was someone with CIA connections involved in Trump's campaign in the first place especially considering that he had Russian connections that were felt to need a FISA warrant to investigate? Was Page a CIA/FBI/"Deep State" plant designed to bring Trump's campaign and presidency down?

George Papadopoulos

Wikipedia - turned 29 years old in August of 2016. At age 28 he served on Ben Carson's campaign and moved on to the Trump campaign. I just ran a search and found that his name appears 386 times in the IG report.

Carter Page

Wikipedia - The suspect in four FBI FISA warrants for surveillance of the Trump campaign starting in October 2016. Trump characterizes these FISA warrants and related surveillance as "spying" on his campaign.

Page's name appears hundreds of times in the IG report but according to footnote 19 on page 12 of that report, "The OIG did not seek to interview Carter Page or any other subject in the Crossfire Hurricane investigation because their actions were not the focus of our review." Go figure.

Joseph Mifsud

Wikipedia - From Malta or London or wherever, seemingly with connections to Italy and Russia

IG report Page 168 footnote 309 indicates that Mifsud was the person who informed George Papadopoulos (then working in the Trump campaign) that the Russians were offering dirt on the Clinton campaign and it was speculated this dirt may have included hacked DNC emails. This footnote indicated that Mifsud denies these allegations.

The IG report discusses a "trusted source" relating to an FFG (Friendly Foreign Government) - see page 53 of that report. The discussions I saw at yesterday's Senate hearings seemed to use this "trusted" source as evidence that the initiation of the FBI investigation into suspected Trump campaign collusion with the Russians was not politically motivated. In fact that conclusion seemed to me to be the one thing that Democrats at this hearing tried to get the public (and the media) to take away from this hearing, their primary focal point of the discussion.

So was Joseph Mifsud the "trusted source"?

Was the trusted foreign government source some sort of foreign intelligence agency that relied on the Mifsud Russia information?

Was it a setup?

If Mifsud was not related to this "trusted source" FFG information then what is this IG report referring to? Isn't it crucial to know if the source was valid before assuming this anti-Trump effort wasn't politically motivated? Why are they keeping this source a secret? Is the source national security related (deep state)?

Karen Greenaway

Name added 12/18/19
This person's name does not seem to appear in Wikipedia.

This name came to my attention in this article:

This Is Why They Must Impeach...

As an agent for the FBI this person is said to have worked to impede Ukraine officials from investigating corruption involving Obama admiration officials.

Here's an article by John Solomon dated 3/26/19 from "The Hill" where this person's roll is mentioned:

US Embassy pressed Ukraine to drop probe of George Soros group during 2016 election
If you can't understand the connection between the "Russia interfered in the 2016 election" narrative and the Ukraine corruption scandal this article might help shed some light for you.
The article points out that Greenaway left the FBI and joined the George Soros funded group called AntAC. The Ukraine story gets pretty twisted at this point where it appears we have Obama administration anti-corruption efforts directly opposing Ukrainian government anti-corruption work which calls into question George Soros related anti-corruption in the Ukraine work. Here's a "Daily Beast" article from September 26, 2019 in defense of Soros:
Rudy’s Big Plan to Defend Trump on Ukraine: Play the George Soros Card
To me, this article reads like Mainstream Media propaganda but you be the judge of that.
One takeaway that I get from these two articles is that it would be quite easy once you accept that the "Deep State" actually exists to include George Soros in its ranks. Soros is a thoroughly creepy person with his fingerprints all over everything anti-Trump.

Another Save - The Jimmy Dore Show

Well I can't, at the moment at least, think of a better place than here for storing this link.
I've been watching this guy on YouTube for awhile and one thing I can assure you is that he is no Republican. He's not a "Conservative" but rather is quite the "Liberal" but oh does he ever get off on the corruption and hypocrisy within the Democratic Party. It's no wonder he understands and appreciates Tulsi Gabbard.

By the way, Jimmy Dore is a professional comedian so his show is entertaining. You have no excuse not to watch this.

So would you like to peek into the "swamp" in Washington?... have a look at what it's really about?

Democrats Deep Ties To Russia & Ukraine Corruption!