Fauci and "Gain of Function" Research
Let this brief video speak for itself:
Ramblings and memories of an amateur wordsmith and philosopher
Let this brief video speak for itself:
This may sound strange but I've been listening to a lot of horns on YouTube today, car horns and truck horns. It seems that a "small fringe" of Canadians with unacceptable ideas have taken it upon themselves to let Canada's leaders in Ottawa and throughout Canada know that they have a way of making themselves heard as they demand an end to the Covid mandates.
Even Elon Musk is in solidarity with this movement.
Lunatic fringe, I know you're out there...
I can't help but wonder what will become of this. It's possible that this could add fuel to the fire feeding the protests against mandates and lockdowns:
An idea just came to me...
"Woke" is the new discrimination, the new superiority, the new way to look down at other people, believe in your own superiority, and fit in with the crowd with nobody of any significance calling you what you actually are, a bigot.
Is it my imagination or has there been a sea change in liberal politics in the United States?
The attitude about Biden since "Let's go Brandon" has changed. It's now OK to see Biden for what he is, cognitively challenged. It's also OK to point out that Biden abandoned his moderate political reputation in order to appease the AOC left, a politically unstable demographic who no doubt would love to see all senile old men die.
The attitude toward covid is changing because it's hard to maintain the illusions in the face of reality. Yes, the vaxed can spread covid. No, the vax doesn't protect the way they claimed it would. More on the way. No, it's not true what Supreme Court Justice Sotomayer said about a hundred thousand kids and covid.
It isn't likely that the paranoia over Russia will change since that one is so bipartisan. War mongers on the right join virtually all liberals in the need to trash Putin and the Russian people. Besides, that's an issue that could get Hillary Clinton elected.
Which brings me to the point.
Why has the sea changed? Why is the media suddenly acknowledging right-wing talking points?
My guess? Because Hillary is running for President again.
But hey, that's just one man's opinion.
Here's an interesting chat among liberals who, realizing how far behind they are falling because of their delusions, are beginning to wake up. It's an interesting contrast between two liberals who are just beginning to realize the truth and a third who is still stuck in the covid fear mongering popularity contest.
The force is out there...
I've never thought of covid propaganda as a popularity contest but that's exactly what it is. Listen to the audience cheer when their favorite viewpoints are mentioned. Think about it for a minute... or a day or a week or maybe for the rest of your life. False information and hyped fear over covid have been popular with certain segments of society with no regard to truth or accuracy. Then look at the damage that has been done as a result. None of these three liberals even now can say that the information they now are admitting has been out there all along and that they have just been blind to the truth. That's like saying your opponent in a beauty contest is better looking than you are. It's like hey if I convince myself that the popular viewpoint is true then I can be popular myself just by defending it, to hell with the truth.
I wonder if I might be the only person on earth who has noticed that recently nobody has been mentioning NATO when discussing the Ukraine. No, you say, that's not true. They have been talking about the Ukraine joining NATO all last year. True, I say, they were, all last year. But all of a sudden, nobody is mentioning NATO.
Why might that be?
Russia has made it crystal clear that they will not let NATO advance into the Ukraine, that if they try, it means war.
The Biden administration does not want to be perceived as provoking Russian aggression even though expanding NATO into the Ukraine would provoke Russian aggression.
Therefore, the word is out (or it must be), keep silent about NATO, because now nobody is talking about expanding NATO into the Ukraine.
It's not like anything has changed. The Biden people still want NATO to advance into the Ukraine. They just want news viewers, their real base, to be ignorant when the war breaks out and blame everything on Russian aggression.
Now that's just one man's opinion, mind you, mine, but it's not like I've never seen the media being used to ensure that their viewers are clueless.
I can't be talking about baseball:
Lately I have been trying to figure out what there is about liberals that make them so different from truthers like myself. I've basically given up trying to reach liberal relatives with truth. When I think back, I realize I used to be where they are now. You couldn't reach me with truth. I didn't care. I felt I knew everything I needed to know because I kept up with the news enough to know that I stood with the majority and that was enough for me.
I was reading some of the comments for an article this morning and I came across this comment:
Sheeple simply ignore facts. Like seriously ignore. Will not even look. I live in country full of them. My parents are communists.
The key to remaining communist is to NEVER EVER LOOK at the other side of the story. Just refuse.
I offered the list of Doctors urging ivermectin and its amazing history..wont look!
I offered the 150 peer reviewed scientific studies saying masks do little to nothing...wont look!
I offered the Steele Dosier debunking from UK court and subsequent judgement against him & Fusion GPS..wont look!
I offered the Hunter Biden laptop pics & story...wont look!
I offer logic and reason and they refuse to look.
That is the key. Make them see.
Here's the link to the article:
https://www.oann.com/covid-response-briefing-praises-fitted-masks-in-fight-against-virus/
I am reminded of Maine's ugly (inside and out) governor and the nightmare in the Democrat-controlled Maine government.
There are times when reading the news is overwhelming. There are two forms of news. One is truth and the other isn't and the one that isn't truth lies about the one that is.
One believes in truth.
The other, when you confront them, doesn't believe in the existence of truth. Truth is relative, they say. For them, what matters most is the story and its outcome.
On truth the solid rock I stand. All other ground is sinking sand.
The worst part is that the lines are blurred, and I am not qualified to be the judge.
The world is fauxy.
I was just Googling for information on remdesivir, a drug currently recommended in official protocols for the treatment of Covid-19 and wound up reading an article on an NIH internet site titled:
Web Address: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7685699/
This article has all the appearance of being a report on scientific research and has a publication date of November 20, 2020.
Apparently some folks went really out of their way to establish what an evil effect that President Trump's various communications had on the public welfare by mentioning unproven treatments for Covid-19 early in the pandemic cycle. Frequent mention is made to one death that occurred as a result of a chloroquine overdose, an event that caused a media storm at the time. No other deaths are mentioned which leads me to believe that the main focus of the study, the bullseye, was this one death.
The discussion at the end of this article would, it seems to me, lead any reader to imagine that President Trump disregarded scientific information and acted irresponsibly by mentioning several possible treatments for Covid that had not been FDA approved. According to data charted in this article, see Table 2, chloroquine was first mentioned in the media by President Trump on March 19, 2020.
The report doesn't mention that chloroquine was approved for emergency use to treat Covid-19 nine days later, March 28, 2020:
https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a682318.html
Note that this emergency use authorization was canceled June 15, 2020.
In other words, Trump beat the FDA to the punch by nine days triggering these scientists to issue a scathing report about how irresponsible he was to do so since it led to one overdose death.
Isn't that just science for ya? I used to enjoy science but it has become so corrupt!
But you know, when it comes to Trump Derangement Syndrome anything goes.
I must say it's entertaining watching video of Rand Paul grilling Doctor Fauci in Senate hearings. It's clear to me that Fauci just plain doesn't want anybody to know the truth about what he has been up to in recent years. He has mastered the art of redefining words and using the new definition to hide himself from what he has done to the world with his medical experimentation. And of course since his work is secret, you and I have no right to know about it and the lies are justified from a government perspective. He can actually lie under oath in the United States Senate and be protected by law for doing so. They always said that if we legalize the killing of humans by abortions it would bring a curse on America. Well the curse seems to be the face of the good doctor telling his covert lies to cover up the mass murder of us all.
Then again, considering that this rant is just my personal opinion, maybe I'm wrong about this. But watching Fauci is like watching a horror movie in extreme slow motion.
I wonder if maybe she had Covid while she was partying in Florida. Was she spreading Covid in Florida?
I wonder if she's smart enough to be using Ivermectin and zinc. Rumor has it that members of Congress use Ivermectin after testing positive for Covid. Had she used it before vacationing in Florida she may not have become a Covid spreader. The vaccines obviously didn't help.
I've had a suspicion for months that this is happening. It's really the only thing that makes sense considering what has been happening. Now the theory is out in the public.
Good luck disproving this one:
More info here:
I have been wondering for quite some time now why the courts have not been actively investigating what appears to me to be obvious criminal activity causing untold death and misery worldwide from these vaccines and the denial of proven treatments for Covid. I think what happened in the US Supreme Court last week with Justice Sotomayer's wild claim about children is a clue though. The courts are clueless so how can anyone expect them to help resolve these issues?
The courts won't help us. Mainstream media won't help us because they're in on it. Big Tech won't help us because they censor the truth. The government is corrupt so it won't help. So guess what? That leaves you! You're the one who needs to find the truth and you can't do it by choosing your favorite media outlets and politicians. Get that? You can't choose favorites here. You have to be willing to go where the truth hangs out, where propaganda doesn't stand a chance and that only exists inside your own head. That's why I keep saying people need to wake up. Open the doors of your mind to that part of thinking where propaganda doesn't stand a chance. You don't get there with a closed mind. You don't get there by imagining you already know what's right and wrong when you actually know very little. All around you there are narrow-minded people telling you what you should believe and disbelieve. You don't have to be like them!
Humor me.
For the most part I am not in a position to be affected by things that go on in Chicago. I stay out of their big city business and hope they stay out of my small town America experience. City folk tend to be conformists and rural folk tend to be somewhat more independent, skeptical. Skepticism, by the way, is the opposite of conformity.
But it's hard to keep up with the news without hearing or reading about the dispute between Chicago's despicable and enormously ugly little mayor and the teachers union which is insisting on returning to remote learning because of the Covid surge. In this morning's Google News headlines I noticed one that triggered something in me so I began reading the article:
Children Belong in School. That’s Why We Support the Chicago Teachers Union.
To me at least, that headline seems a bit Orwellian. I suppose that's what triggered me. I have to admit I found the article a bit difficult to follow. In it I came across this sentence:
If you have the misfortune, as I do, to follow school policy debates on Twitter, you will, almost daily, see people decrying opponents of school closures as privileged white Karens who hate their children and don’t want them around.
It's almost like doing a difficult math problem just figuring out all the negatives in that one sentence and balancing the whole thing long enough in my mind to make sense of the sentence. Know what I mean?
1. misfortune
2. decrying
3. opponents
4. closures
5. "privileged white Karens" (There might even be two or even three negatives in this one if "privileged" is meant as a negative along with "white". White wouldn't be in this sentence if it wasn't a negative. Karens are certainly negative.)
6. "hate their children"
7. "don't want them around"
And that's just one sentence! Seven, possibly eight or even nine negatives confusingly jumbled into just one sentence in an article whose logic seems at its core to be Orwellian? This is journalism? How many times did it take me to read the term "people decrying opponents of school closures" before its meaning sunk in? OK so you have school closures caused by the teachers who all want schools to reopen if I read that article correctly [Orwellian or what!). Then you have opponents of school closures but not the teachers who want schools open but whose union doesn't. These teachers wishing the schools were open presumably want their unions to keep the schools closed. No, these opponents referred to in this one sentence are rational people who want kids to be able to attend school. So you have teachers who want schools closed against their own will and you have ordinary citizens like me who want kids attending school but what about these "Karens"? Where do they fit in?
Let's see, the sentence identifies Karens as "people decrying opponents of school closures". It also identifies these Karens as both privileged and white, one and the same thing if you follow liberal media outlets and leftist rhetoric. So wait, do these "Karens" want schools open or do they want them closed? Maybe I don't have this as figured out as I thought I did...
Corporate media?
Big Pharma?
Corporate healthcare?
Big government?
Strangers?
Foreigners?
This is a well-done comprehensive video of the log booms from Vancouver Island:
So is this what you expect from the vaccinated? If you believe in the mandates this might surprise you. If you're a skeptic maybe you would expect this:
I just read something in the news reporting that AOC thinks Republicans are jealous of her boyfriend because they want to date her but can't.
Now I'm in no position to judge but if you ask me, this little barmaid has had a bit too much to drink.
What Republican would ever want to date Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? Who is she kidding? She is repulsive to the nth degree. Every time she opens her mouth whiney shit comes out. But then again, I am selective about the ladies I fantasize about. I don't fantasize about Socialist/Fascist women with shit coming out their oversized lipstick-painted mouths.